[Dev] TIBCO driver for TestMaker

[ad]

yep 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: dev-bounces at lists.pushtotest.com
[mailto:dev-bounces at lists.pushtotest.com] Namens Frank Cohen
Verzonden: donderdag 23 november 2006 22:49
Aan: Load and TestMaker Developers List
Onderwerp: Re: [Dev] TIBCO driver for TestMaker

Hi Ad: Thanks for telling me about Greehat Tester. I read their marketing
materials at http://greenhatconsulting.com/ghtester. It looks like TestMaker
could be a good framework to build an ESB testing tool. It seems that the
following would be needed:

a) Change the recorder to generically capture XML messages, create a list of
captured messages, and choose which ones to play back.
b) ProtocolHandlers for JMS, TIBCO RV, IBM MQ, Sonic MQ and Fiorano MQ (or
some subset of these)
c) Documentation to show how to use it

Of the protocol handlers, is TIBCO RV the most import one for you?

-Frank




On Nov 21, 2006, at 11:27 AM, ad wrote:

> Frank,
>
> What I would value is :
>
> . Listen to RV, RVCM,RVCMQ and JMS.
> . Publish to RV, RVCM,RVCMQ and JMS.
> . Messages formats in XML and AE.
> . Compare messages.
> . Create message flows or scenario's from BW processes.
> . Copy message formats form BW.
>
> Well everything that greenhatconsulting.com has in their Greenhat 
> Tester.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Ad van der Ende
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: dev-bounces at lists.pushtotest.com
> [mailto:dev-bounces at lists.pushtotest.com] Namens Frank Cohen
> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 november 2006 17:07
> Aan: Load and TestMaker Developers List
> Onderwerp: [Dev] TIBCO driver for TestMaker
>
> We have a TIBCO driver for BusinessWorks and their ESB product in the 
> works.
> It is something that will be available after the TestMaker 5 launch 
> this Spring.
>
> Since you asked, I'd like to know what you would value in a Tibco 
> protocol handler?
>
> -Frank
>
>
>
> On Nov 21, 2006, at 5:37 AM, a.vanderende wrote:
>
>> Frank,
>>
>> Is there a TIBCO protocol for pushtotest?
>>
>>
>> Quoting Frank Cohen <fcohen at pushtotest.com>:
>>
>>> Can someone help me with a pointer to a posting that proposed a 
>>> solution to the proxy recorder's non-support for HTTPS protocols? I 
>>> remember someone came up with a solution where the proxy recorder 
>>> acts as the HTTPS client but I haven't found it. -Frank
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> Dev at lists.pushtotest.com
>>> http://lists.pushtotest.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Powered by InfoPact - http://www.infopact.nl/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.pushtotest.com
>> http://lists.pushtotest.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.pushtotest.com
> http://lists.pushtotest.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1564 (20060529) Informatie __________
>
> Dit bericht is gecontroleerd door het NOD32 Antivirus Systeem.
> http://www.nod32.nl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.pushtotest.com
> http://lists.pushtotest.com/mailman/listinfo/dev
>

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev at lists.pushtotest.com
http://lists.pushtotest.com/mailman/listinfo/dev

__________ NOD32 1.1564 (20060529) Informatie __________

Dit bericht is gecontroleerd door het NOD32 Antivirus Systeem.
http://www.nod32.nl