[ptt-users] HTTP test recording

[Frank Cohen]

Thanks for suggesting the feature. I contacted the MaxQ developer to see if
he may be interested in some sort of collaboration.

I like the MaxQ approach - to implement a proxy server - but I am a little
concerned that some Web applications use of Javascript may not be covered
unless there is more modeling of what the browser does. Using MaxQ's
approach seems clean and easy.

-Frank

-- 
Frank Cohen, CEO, PushToTest, www.pushtotest.com, phone: 408 374 7426
Come to PushToTest for free open-source Active Security solutions that test,
monitor and automate Web Service systems for functionality, scalability and
performance.


> From: "Jean-Louis BERLIET" <jl.berliet at wanadoo.fr>
> Reply-To: users at lists.pushtotest.com
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 11:13:38 +0200
> To: <users at lists.pushtotest.com>, <info at pushtotest.com>
> Subject: [ptt-users] HTTP test recording
> 
> It could be very handy to have HTTP test recording like MaxQ
> (http://www.bitmechanic.com/projects/maxq/).
> It includes an HTTP proxy that automatically records a jython script : it's
> like a macro recorder in word or excel.
> Source code is provided with maxq, so perhaps it could be integrated into
> PushToTest ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jean-Louis BERLIET