[ptt-users] TM 5.1 RC 2: editing buffer stops responding
Lars Huttar
lars_huttar at sil.org
Tue Feb 26 00:48:41 PST 2008
Hello Frank,
OK, the Java version that comes up from the command line is
java version "1.6.0_02"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b06)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_02-b06, mixed mode)
Thanks, I would appreciate having a bug tracker account.
Lars
> Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:06:44 -0500 (EST)
>
> Hi Lars:
>
> You can tell which Java you are using by running "java -version" from
> the command-line.
>
> Thanks for the usability improvements. Your ideas are very good. I
> opened a new ticket to track the improvements at http://
> bugs.pushtotest.com/ticket/212. I would be happy to give you an
> account to add your own enhancement/bug requests.
>
> -Frank
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
>
>
>> Frank,
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> My OS is WinXP Pro SP2.
>> Java version: I'm not really sure! I have more several versions
>> installed, from 1.4.2_12 to 1.6.0_02. Is there an easy way to tell
>> which one TM is using?
>> Video driver: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M, 4/28/2007, 6.14.11.119
>> Mouse driver: Alps Touch Pad, 10-19-2005, 5.4.104.4
>>
>> Since you asked about feedback to improve usability, one thing I
>> have noticed in the last few days is this:
>> There are four "Open" actions available in the main window:
>> 1- one labeled toolbutton in the upper toolbar
>> 2- one unlabeled button (with an "Open" tooltip) in the lower toolbar
>> 3- one "Open..." item on the File menu, which is also Ctrl+O
>> 4- one "Open TestScenario..." item on the File menu.
>>
>> The first and last items open a dialog. The second and third items
>> may seem at first to do nothing, but (it took me a while to figure
>> this out) they actually put the keyboard focus into the Location
>> bar, apparently with the idea of navigating around by editing the
>> path and pressing Enter.
>>
>> So the main issue is that this is all confusing. It's not obvious
>> to the user which of these "Open" functions are the same and which
>> are different, and what each one does.
>> - Are 1 and 4 redundant with each other? Will 1 not work for
>> opening TestScenarios? Does 4 have any advantage over 1? If they do
>> the same thing, why are there two different menu items?
>> - Since 2 and 3 do the same thing as each other, but something
>> different from 1 and 4, it would be clearer if 2 and 3 were labeled
>> distinctly from 1 and 4. E.g. 2 and 3 might be labeled "Browse" or
>> "Navigate" or something like that.
>> (Or, either the navigation interface or the file-open dialog could
>> be removed from the UI; they seem redundant with each other as far
>> as I can tell.)
>>
>> Another small issue: if you go to the View menu and uncheck
>> Toolbar, then go back and check it again, the toolbar you get back
>> is not like the toolbar that was there originally. The original one
>> had about four toolbuttons in the upper row. The new toolbar has
>> only one button in the upper row, labeled "PushToTest", which seems
>> to do nothing.
>>
>> One more usability issue:
>> To create a "new" something, there are two places to do it: the
>> toolbar, which offers new load test, new service monitor, and new
>> functional test; and the File / New menu item, which opens a
>> "Create a new test" dialog, which offers four other test creation
>> options.
>> It's not obvious to the newbie why there are these two separate
>> groups, and so I don't necessarily know which group to go to when I
>> want to create a new test.
>> My analysis, after learning PTT for a while, is that the File/New
>> dialog is for creating new *unit* tests, while the toolbar buttons
>> create higher-level tests that make use of unit tests. Am I right?
>> If so, it would be helpful to label the two methods that way, e.g.
>> "New Unit Test" vs "New Test Scenario" (is that the right term for
>> functional and load tests and service monitors?)
>> (Alternatively, they could be collapsed into one group.)
>> If they are two separate groups, it would be helpful (for usability
>> -- "Don't Make Me Think! [tm] :-) if the two were accessed in
>> parallel ways - i.e. both through the menu, or both through
>> toolbars, or both via both; rather than one via toolbar only, and
>> one via menu only.
>>
>> Just my few cents. Probably more than you bargained for.
>> :-)
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/2008 8:37 AM, Frank Cohen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lars:
>>>
>>> TestMaker uses the J editor and I believe the freezing problem is
>>> located in that module. What is your OS, version of Java, video
>>> driver, mouse driver?
>>>
>>> By the way, we are working on major changes to the UI to make it
>>> more user-friendly. (This is WAY over due.) Changing editors is
>>> one of things I have in mind. I would certainly appreciate any
>>> feedback to improve the usability.
>>>
>>> -Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I'm in TM 5.1 now, with buffers open such as C:\src\tm5\TestMaker
>>>> \build.xml and C:\Program Files\PushToTest_TestMaker
>>>> \example_agents\testgen4web_examples
>>>> \PTT_Examples_UnitTest.testgen4web
>>>>
>>>> The problem I'm experiencing is that the editing buffer -- the
>>>> window that shows the contents of each file -- does not respond
>>>> to keyboard or mouse input.
>>>> If I click the mouse in that area, the blinking cursor goes to
>>>> the start of the buffer. But I cannot move the cursor with mouse
>>>> or keyboard, nor type or delete text, change the selection, etc.
>>>> On the other hand, other controls in TM are responsive: the
>>>> Location bar is fine, as is the Output window.
>>>>
>>>> When I restart TM, the problem goes away.
>>>> I'm not sure at what point the problem began.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Lars
>>>>
>>>>
>> _____________________________
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list